JVC M50
vincent - 2012-12-05 07:18
What do members think of the JVC M50 and its sound? It looks more like the M70 than either the M60 or M80. Would it be a worthwhile addition to complete the JVC collection- I have the M90, M70 and the 550 monobox at this point.
litfan - 2012-12-05 09:56
One box, i`ve never heard. Looks like a mini m90, but, i`m guessing, it`s way behind, in the sound stakes. The m80, is a nice sounding box, spoiled, by the speaker covering. Hey RR, this is a coincidence. You are giving advice, to your apprentice. He`s already picked up your spelling skills.
vincent - 2012-12-05 10:13
RR and I see eye to I
stereo.mad - 2012-12-05 10:39
What do members think of the JVC M50 and its sound? It looks more like the M70 than either the M60 or M80. Would it be a worthwhile addition to complete the JVC collection- I have the M90, M70 and the 550 monobox at this point.
don't listen to them man there just gel....any jvc sounds quality and a worth while investment
retrodos - 2012-12-05 10:45
Always wanted to try a M80, as see them from time to time. Wonder how they sound?
stereo.mad - 2012-12-05 10:49
Always wanted to try a M80, as see them from time to time. Wonder how they sound?
ditto^
would like a m80 but they don't often come up
traveler - 2012-12-05 11:13
Blue, 70, 50, 575, 656, 9935
Top mounted controls - slider's get dirtier quicker versus rotated knob's
samovar - 2012-12-05 11:16
i like the look of the m80, not despite but because of the speaker coverings a few months ago i was offered one by a private, but i don't trust this guy so i didn't take it.
radio.raheem - 2012-12-05 11:21
Always wanted to try a M80, as see them from time to time. Wonder how they sound?
ditto^
would like a m80 but they don't often come up
they sound just like a 555 lee don't bother....i gave mine away to lav who diddn't have it long lol
stereo.mad - 2012-12-05 11:28
Always wanted to try a M80, as see them from time to time. Wonder how they sound?
ditto^
would like a m80 but they don't often come up
they sound just like a 555 lee don't bother....i gave mine away to lav who diddn't have it long lol
lol ok reno ill take your word for it lad
traveler - 2012-12-05 12:32
Always wanted to try a M80, as see them from time to time. Wonder how they sound?
ditto^
would like a m80 but they don't often come up
they sound just like a 555 lee don't bother....i gave mine away to lav who diddn't have it long lol
Which Brand '555' ? are you referring to?
If you mean a JVC RC-555 - that's a really tiny bbx "6 D batteries worth" versus any other model's here
radio.raheem - 2012-12-05 12:34
sharp gf555
retrodos - 2012-12-05 13:12
I guess I will soon find out how a JVC M80 compares to the rest, as just won one.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/300825715216?ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1497.l2649
deech - 2012-12-05 13:14
docs - 2012-12-05 13:17
Try the M50 out. I believe that the M series are quite average sounding other than the top end audio quality of the M70 and M90.
It is true the M80 is not the best sounding box in the world but it is not that bad either, and what it lacks in bass it certainly makes up for in sheer quality.
docs - 2012-12-05 13:18
I guess I will soon find out how a JVC M80 compares to the rest, as just won one.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/300825715216?ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1497.l2649
Congrats retrodos, try not to compare it to the others in the range with superb audio quality, it is a different beast with different things in mind. Overall the M80 is an excellent box and oozes the usual JVC quality.
radio.raheem - 2012-12-05 13:30
I guess I will soon find out how a JVC M80 compares to the rest, as just won one.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/300825715216?ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1497.l2649
Congrats morice.....great deck great build just don't expect to much....the only jvc i would recommend is the jvc pc55 best deck in the world on a boombox with dolby c better deck than an m90 and the unit splits into 2 peices plus your speakers ohh and the pc5 aint bad eather but you will need to reafoam the speakers..
you were right about my amp lad....one just sold for £250...guess i paid £250 to much for a cardboard boxes and manuals gutted....but who cares at the end of the day i swapped it for a boombox lad
traveler - 2012-12-05 13:32
sharp gf555
oh, that industrial looking serious box
traveler - 2012-12-05 13:40
Depending upon the Nostalgia you need get a 838 // Hard to find a complete working 838 and with only 2.2 watt's per channel they are not that loud
Big JVC fan here
retrodos - 2012-12-05 14:09
I guess I will soon find out how a JVC M80 compares to the rest, as just won one.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/300825715216?ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1497.l2649
Congrats retrodos, try not to compare it to the others in the range with superb audio quality, it is a different beast with different things in mind. Overall the M80 is an excellent box and oozes the usual JVC quality.
The m90 and m70 will alway be their best efforts. The m80 looks well built from pictures, as have two motor cassette deck with logic control and music scan and looks to be a real tweeters and decent tuner, better wow and flutter specs then m70. But only 3.5 watts RMS per channel, so not as powerful as the m90, or m70. Sure be worth restoring and sound decent enough.
retrodos - 2012-12-05 14:13
I guess I will soon find out how a JVC M80 compares to the rest, as just won one.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/300825715216?ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1497.l2649
Congrats morice.....great deck great build just don't expect to much....the only jvc i would recommend is the jvc pc55 best deck in the world on a boombox with dolby c better deck than an m90 and the unit splits into 2 peices plus your speakers ohh and the pc5 aint bad eather but you will need to reafoam the speakers..
you were right about my amp lad....one just sold for £250...guess i paid £250 to much for a cardboard boxes and manuals gutted....but who cares at the end of the day i swapped it for a boombox lad
Looking for a good condition jvc pc55, were the display still works.
What box did you get for the amp, or do you mean you traded a boombox for the amp? Amp of course would sound better overall as separate components and cost more during it's day, and better built quailty.
radio.raheem - 2012-12-05 14:19
i traded the crown 970 for the amp.....the amp is a keeper my friend as it has always been my wholy grail amp....dispite what she may be worth i wouldn't trade the amp for any box.....she is only on small speakers sb m300 but she makes the kaboom sound like a tin can
litfan - 2012-12-05 14:33
You don`t half talk some clap trap lad . I`m gonna publish a book "translating raheem speak". Never mind "under the bridge, with dick & harry".
retrodos - 2012-12-05 14:35
i traded the crown 970 for the amp.....the amp is a keeper my friend as it has always been my wholy grail amp....dispite what she may be worth i wouldn't trade the amp for any box.....she is only on small speakers sb m300 but she makes the kaboom sound like a tin can
Any decent HiFi component will beat out a box, just due to the fact more cost in them and runs on higher rail voltage and only on AC. Boomboxes are not made for home HiFi replacement, but made for outside use, where most only run on 15 volts rail, so the internal amp is limited and runs of batteries and have to conserve mah. Some boxes were pretty decent for what they are design for, as back in the day most time was spent outside.
litfan - 2012-12-05 14:36
"Better builted"? .
radio.raheem - 2012-12-05 14:38
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/1509...id=p3984.m1497.l2649
on these retrodos dispite there small size these have 2 or 3 hidden speakers inside..
i tried the amp on my mission 753
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/MISS...;hash=item1c2e2435dc
these little technics eat the mission alive....sorry for thread jacking as usual
retrodos - 2012-12-05 14:42
"Better builted"? .
Corrected.
litfan - 2012-12-05 14:43
You will NEVER, beat the sound, of a vintage valve amp, i dont care what anyone say`s. I`ve seen the proof. Radford sta25 vs £50,000 japanese amp. Winner? radford, of course.
radio.raheem - 2012-12-05 14:44
"Better builted"? .
I think he means better belted....I think we have all had to much fun today rich..lol
retrodos you dont mean better builted my friend you mean better built....pardon me for correcting you...as for me there is no hope lol
watch it lit or we will have to show some of your beutiful atire...(i actually love it) my carpet came from a skip mate
retrodos - 2012-12-05 14:47
You will NEVER, beat the sound, of a vintage valve amp, i dont care what anyone say`s. I`ve seen the proof. Radford sta25 vs £50,000 japanese amp. Winner? radford, of course.
You are correct. Using tube pre-amp and dual mono block kt88 amplifier, never was into solid state amps.
radio.raheem - 2012-12-05 14:53
valve amps are the best but to correct for this i use twin graphic eq 2 x 12 nothing compairs to this when in use....you can actualy hear and feel 20 hz or lower with big speakers....much cheaper same result
litfan - 2012-12-05 14:57
What about, a pair of quad II`s. These things, are starting to fetch big money. Best amp i had, was a beam echo avantic sp22, from around 1959. Bought it from a bloke for £10, sold it for £100+ That thing, was sweet as a nut. treble, like you wouldn`t believe. Watch it RR, or, i`ll send duncan norvel round. He`ll put you over his knee. Ooooo matron.
radio.raheem - 2012-12-05 15:09
Feck Lit this forum would be crap without you my friend haha god bless lad
send duncan round, i can't find my wellies or my mums vibrator